TeamSpeak VoyeUR Beta 0.93.2

[patag]

I'm pleased to announce that TeamSpeak VoyeUR is nearing version 1.0.

TeamSpeak VoyeUR is a Flash application that consumes a XML feed detailing a specific instance of TeamSpeak. It will display server information, channel information, and player information. The interface is skinnable via a simple XML file and it allows players to connect to the server listed. TeamSpeak VoyeUR uses TCPQuery to gather the server information.

A simple demo is detailed here:

http://patag.universalrealms.com/ts.htm (This example uses TeamSpeak's Beta 3 Server)

The next example shows how TeamSpeak VoyeUR can be integrated into a web site:

http://preview.universalrealms.com

Feedback would be appreciated!

[slankerric]

Where can I download this at? I love it.

[N3NCY]

Where can I get Voyeur?

[R. Ludwig]

nice one, good work peeps!

[patag]

Thanks for the positive feedback! We are in the process of getting the application ready for release. Since I have to host a server to gather the information for a specific TS server, there will be a small annual fee required for use.

Once again, when I have more details, I'll post here.

[Bastian]

See image attached to this post. This is how it looks in Firefox 0.8.

By the way: When I open this page it disconnects my TS session.

[patag]

See image attached to this post. This is how it looks in Firefox 0.8.

By the way: When I open this page it disconnects my TS session.

I'm using Firefox 0.9.2 and I'm not having that problem. I'm also not getting disconnected when I run it. Anyone else having the same issues?

[N3NCY]

Dear Patag,

I can understand you charging a fee.
I have my own servers.
I would be interested in purchasing a single server license, not an anual fee.
Please consider the stand-alone purchase as an option.
No source code. You could also charge for upgrades.

In any case, I don't mind a fee for good software...
But I (like some others with servers) would like to own my copy.
You could have two versions.
1.) A Subscription Version
2.) A Stand Alone Version

Just a thought, let us know...

Thank you,

Ernie

[patag]

Dear Patag,

I can understand you charging a fee.
I have my own servers.
I would be interested in purchasing a single server license, not an anual fee.
Please consider the stand-alone purchase as an option.
No source code. You could also charge for upgrades.

In any case, I don't mind a fee for good software...
But I (like some others with servers) would like to own my copy.
You could have two versions.
1.) A Subscription Version
2.) A Stand Alone Version

Just a thought, let us know...

Thank you,

Ernie

We will be taking that into consideration. The application will be broken up into two functional pieces.

1- A web service that will build the XML data
2- A flash interface to display the data

The idea right now is we offer access to just the flash portion of our application and we host the part that builds the XML. The web service is written in .NET, so if we sold that solution also, you would have to be running on a Windows Server with the .NET framework.

Thanks for the feedback and I'll see what we can do.

[Bastian]

Same problem after update to Firefox 0.9.3 (German Translation) on Windows XP

[K9Trooper]

Not to sound like an a$$ or anything but why not create it so people can host it on their own and distribute it for free?

All you people work hard on these things and deserve a world of credit, but when you start to charge money for a very minimal service for program that is free (For the most part)... I don't get it. It is a very nice program you got there Patag and years away from anything I could even dream of making but to charg for it? Gryphon does not charge for his webpost, Brain didn't charge for his (Ashame some jerk stole it).

To say the fee is to pay for the cost of you running the server, well have you put any thought in how many links you can handle and what your bandwidth usage will be in a month? It's possible the fees may be bigger than you think.

I don't know, I just feel it would be nice if you could make a release that people could host on their own. Very, very nice though. The colors are a little bright, my taste goes more to the darker side for colors (Black, Dk Blues and such).

[Altaric]

if you place a fee (one time or anual) who the hell will be interesed ? and you'll have worked hard for .. nothing that's what i think ...

[N3NCY]

Patag,

I run multiple servers, and of course like a real man:
1.) One of my servers is a Windows 2003 .NET Powered Server
2.) I do not ask for a FREE ride

A one-time fee for both Server-side .NET XML Code and Client-side Flash code is what I am requesting for my site. I am not looking to sell, redistribute or otherwise, I would be interested only in a single server (unlimited client) license for my server.

In response to the begger community:
FREE Open Source applications are great if the creator desires it.
Every once in a while, these software developers may want to make just a little bit of cash for things like food and gas money. Consider this fact before your pimpled face decides to bitch about not getting another FREE RIDE.

N3NCY

[dsc_chris]

I agree with N3NCY, A software developer works hard to get things to work right and deserves to charge for his/her software if they so please. Honestly I love the idea going on here and wouldnt mind paying a fee big or small as flash does take a bit of skills to actually work with. And the whole using an "existing free software" idea is not being thrown out, he/she is utiliziing the tcpquery idea to get the information Ya I know I am confusing, sorry

[K9Trooper]

Then if he is going to make money off of TS, he should be paying a fee to TS as well. It is their program that he coded it for. TS charges people that want to lease out their servers, why should this be different? In the end you are finding a way to profit off of TS without having to pay TS.

To call us a beggar community is wrong and insulting. I have a Win2K3 box and run several TS servers on it. I do not make a dime off of any of them.