Results 1 to 6 of 6
-
25-02-2011, 19:12 #1
-= TeamSpeak User =-
- Join Date
- Feb 2011
- Posts
- 3
[Suggestion] Delay Settings 90sec for Live CSS Matches
Is it possible to add a feature that could handle the delay of 90sek. if i watch my m8s in a match, i am in the same ts3 channel, but their ingame commands and the hltv broadcast with 90 sec delay didnt match (of course) .. so if i possibly record the ts3 voices and play it with 90sec delay it will match, u know what i mean? sry4bad-english. just for the case, i am testing a new member for the mainteam and i wanna watch him playing with the lineup, so it would be very nice, when i can rate his critical commands or his reaction to the commands by the captain..
i hope u understand my question
-
01-03-2011, 14:36 #2
-= TeamSpeak Team =-
- Join Date
- Jun 2008
- Posts
- 7,764
This idea does not sound bad for all these hardcore gamers.
But a delay of 18 seconds means, that you will timeout and the most user wan't a fast reply from their mates.
Why you don't put a delay in your software, when you put the video and voice together? (if there is a video in the end)Last edited by dante696; 06-03-2012 at 07:18.
-
05-03-2012, 22:57 #3
-= TeamSpeak User =-
- Join Date
- Feb 2011
- Posts
- 3
here i am again.. took a while but i saw your post now..
i think u didnt understand my scenario.. i am not talking about video and voice cuting. all had to be in realtime..
think of a counterstrike:source match 5on5 .. i am a spectator on HLTV with a delay of 90sec.. but i am in the same channel with the 5 playing members. my hltv stream is 90sec behind their commands. u know?
now the question is, how can i get a delay of 90sec in the channel? would be nice if ts3 can stream in another channel e.g. with that delay or something..
-
04-06-2012, 05:33 #4
-= TeamSpeak User =-
- Join Date
- Jun 2012
- Posts
- 6
Sound Buffer
Hi,
Does TS3 support any type of client side buffer? Reason is that I have set up a couple of music streaming bots for TS3. They work great however when a little bit of ping is added to the mix they act up, it is not terrible but I would prefer it not happening.
I have tested this theory against a 0 ping environment and a 20 ping environment, the 20 ping set up was causing the audio to skip or pop.
My plan is to add a good 1-3 second buffer but I am not sure that is possible server side for TS3.
-
04-06-2012, 07:15 #5
-= TeamSpeak Team =-
- Join Date
- Jul 2002
- Location
- Germany
- Posts
- 2,836
Hi,
the receiving client actually buffers incoming sound data, but this is not a configurable variable currently. It is optimised for low delay so losing a packet once in a while is considered "ok" when it gives us the benefit of faster (closer to real time) audio.
-
04-06-2012, 07:25 #6
-= TeamSpeak User =-
- Join Date
- Jun 2012
- Posts
- 6
any plans to add a configurable delay? maybe by channel? I see that the current codec settings support lower bandwidth use by adding a delay, being able to make it longer would be great.
I can also see a lot of other uses for this when it comes to streaming or broadcasting scrims..etc
I should say that I am personally not looking for an 18 second delay, something along the lines of 5 seconds is good.Last edited by kraze1994; 06-06-2012 at 07:27.
Thread Information
Users Browsing this Thread
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Similar Threads
-
channel delay settings ?
By theforaigner in forum General QuestionsReplies: 5Last Post: 25-10-2010, 13:22 -
[Suggestion] Revamp the saving(export) of Identies & user settings
By sgtrwe in forum Suggestions and FeedbackReplies: 2Last Post: 16-06-2010, 00:55 -
[SUGGESTION] Codec settings optional only on parent channel
By Nightwing in forum Suggestions and FeedbackReplies: 0Last Post: 03-06-2010, 17:31 -
[Suggestion]Delay + Retry Times for auto-reconnect?
By willy_sunny in forum Suggestions and FeedbackReplies: 1Last Post: 31-05-2010, 18:41 -
[SUGGESTION] Option to backup 3rd party hosted server settings
By poisonpanik in forum Suggestions and FeedbackReplies: 7Last Post: 11-02-2010, 13:52


Reply With Quote
