Mumble vs. Teamspeak3

[hyperionb]

Was ist eurer Meinung nach besser in Sprachqualität und Latenz?

English:
What is in your opinion better in quality and latency?

[Janni]

German: TeamSpeak 3
English: TeamSpeak 3

[TSPB | Striker]

German: TeamSpeak 3
English: TeamSpeak 3

[schlappy]

German: TeamSpeak 3
English: TeamSpeak 3

[azzy101]

I found TS3 to be extremely low latency.
i found mumble to be low latency also. i havent ran any tests but i fealt ts3 was a few miliseconds faster.

The Qaulity fealt equal if not better on teamspeak for voice, i fealt mumble deafened down peoples volume too much to reduce backround noise where teamspeak didnt.


Keep in mind the codec quality on teamspeak 3 isnt final, more will be added ( apparently)


In terms of features i feel teamspeak 3 easily out bests mumble, though mumble is designed to be minimilistic in nature.

[hyperionb]

I found TS3 to be extremely low latency.
i found mumble to be low latency also. i havent ran any tests but i fealt ts3 was a few miliseconds faster.

The Qaulity fealt equal if not better on teamspeak for voice, i fealt mumble deafened down peoples volume too much to reduce backround noise where teamspeak didnt.


Keep in mind the codec quality on teamspeak 3 isnt final, more will be added ( apparently)


In terms of features i feel teamspeak 3 easily out bests mumble, though mumble is designed to be minimilistic in nature.

Higher codec will only enhance quality?

[azzy101]

Higher codec will only enhance quality?

Yes? .

[brauniii]

German:
war im mumble und ts3 gleichzeitig und hab festgestellt das mumble ein klein bischen schneller ist (niedrigere latenz).
kann aber auch sein das ich ts3 falsch eingestellt hab?!

welchen codec sollte man da auswählen?

English:
i was in mumble and ts3 at the same time and i feel like mumble is a bit faster (lower latency).
maybe my settings are bad in ts3?!

which codec do i have to use?

[Stefan1200]

i was in mumble and ts3 at the same time and i feel like mumble is a bit faster (lower latency).

This is the same I heard in my tests with Mumble 1.1.8 and TS3 beta 5. But Mumble and TS3 was really close to each other, so it can be ignored (in my opinion).

[Master_D]

I've tested it with Mumble 1.2.0, there's also about 250ms between TS3 and Mumble.

The only thing, what makes me prefer Mumble, is that you set your Codec-quality clientside, and not serverside. So everybody can use a quality, that fits his own connection.

On the other side, Mumble is not as well known as Teamspeak, so there is a need for using Teamspeak.

[10to7]

@Master_d how did you measure these 250ms? does it _feel_ like 250ms oder is there any evidence. Is this reproducable?

[Master_D]

it feels like 250ms and it's reproduceable. We've tested it wit about 4 people, all on both servers and for all of them it feels like about 250ms.

[Jaegermeist0r]

Mumble 1.2.0 is faster and has a better and especially constant good voice quality. Teamspeak Voice quality seems to be sensitive affected by bandwith and CPU load on server and client side.

For German User:
http://mumble-tower.de/forum/mumble-...vs-teamspeak-3
Very interesting thread about Teamspeak vs. Mumble.

[Stefan1200]

@ Jaegermeist0r: A discussion about Teamspeak in a Mumble forum is senseless .

[R. Ludwig]

no flame wars here
*closed*