Forum


Notice to all users

We are migrating towards a new forum system located at community.teamspeak.com, as such this forum will become read-only on January 29, 2020

Results 1 to 15 of 15

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    Join Date
    December 2009
    Location
    Germany
    Posts
    2

    Mumble vs. Teamspeak3

    Was ist eurer Meinung nach besser in Sprachqualität und Latenz?

    English:
    What is in your opinion better in quality and latency?

  2. #2
    Join Date
    November 2008
    Posts
    24
    German: TeamSpeak 3
    English: TeamSpeak 3

  3. #3
    Join Date
    August 2009
    Location
    Ahrensburg
    Posts
    47
    German: TeamSpeak 3
    English: TeamSpeak 3

  4. #4
    Join Date
    December 2009
    Location
    Passau
    Posts
    33
    German: TeamSpeak 3
    English: TeamSpeak 3

  5. #5
    Join Date
    November 2009
    Location
    Dublin, Ireland
    Posts
    379
    I found TS3 to be extremely low latency.
    i found mumble to be low latency also. i havent ran any tests but i fealt ts3 was a few miliseconds faster.

    The Qaulity fealt equal if not better on teamspeak for voice, i fealt mumble deafened down peoples volume too much to reduce backround noise where teamspeak didnt.


    Keep in mind the codec quality on teamspeak 3 isnt final, more will be added ( apparently)


    In terms of features i feel teamspeak 3 easily out bests mumble, though mumble is designed to be minimilistic in nature.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    December 2009
    Location
    Germany
    Posts
    2
    Quote Originally Posted by azzy101 View Post
    I found TS3 to be extremely low latency.
    i found mumble to be low latency also. i havent ran any tests but i fealt ts3 was a few miliseconds faster.

    The Qaulity fealt equal if not better on teamspeak for voice, i fealt mumble deafened down peoples volume too much to reduce backround noise where teamspeak didnt.


    Keep in mind the codec quality on teamspeak 3 isnt final, more will be added ( apparently)


    In terms of features i feel teamspeak 3 easily out bests mumble, though mumble is designed to be minimilistic in nature.
    Higher codec will only enhance quality?

  7. #7
    Join Date
    November 2009
    Location
    Dublin, Ireland
    Posts
    379
    Quote Originally Posted by hyperionb View Post
    Higher codec will only enhance quality?
    Yes? .

  8. #8
    Join Date
    July 2009
    Location
    ösiland
    Posts
    7
    German:
    war im mumble und ts3 gleichzeitig und hab festgestellt das mumble ein klein bischen schneller ist (niedrigere latenz).
    kann aber auch sein das ich ts3 falsch eingestellt hab?!

    welchen codec sollte man da auswählen?

    English:
    i was in mumble and ts3 at the same time and i feel like mumble is a bit faster (lower latency).
    maybe my settings are bad in ts3?!

    which codec do i have to use?

  9. #9
    Join Date
    December 2009
    Location
    Germany
    Posts
    2,360
    Quote Originally Posted by brauniii View Post
    i was in mumble and ts3 at the same time and i feel like mumble is a bit faster (lower latency).
    This is the same I heard in my tests with Mumble 1.1.8 and TS3 beta 5. But Mumble and TS3 was really close to each other, so it can be ignored (in my opinion).

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. [Rejected] Mumble Server Support
    By lrn2code in forum Suggestions and Feedback
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: July 8th, 2014, 07:29 AM
  2. TS3 on same server as Mumble?
    By Belteyn in forum Linux / FreeBSD
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: June 10th, 2014, 07:51 AM
  3. [REQUEST] Mumble overlay
    By hotpocket in forum Client Plugins / Lua Scripts
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: February 25th, 2013, 09:24 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •